Swiatek, Sinner, Halep & Moore – what are the differences and similarities in their doping cases?
In her case, Moore dropped 600 spots in the world rankings, and with doping bans preventing players from entering official tennis facilities, she ended up making money coaching beginners on public courts in the United States.
Moore told july times, external She believes the total cost of the case will be £200,000 and she has turned to crowdfunding to pay for training and ongoing costs.
Her case is also complex.
Twenty-one players were tested in Bogota and Moore was one of three players to return unfavorable analytical results for Boldenone – a result that independent experts said was “shocking” because it was so unusual.
The panel ruled that contaminated meat was the source of Moore’s test failure. Written reasons showed how difficult it would be for Moore to prove when and where she ingested the contaminated meat. She had eaten meat at different restaurants in Bogotá seven days before testing positive, making it difficult to determine the source.
Moore did present evidence that Colombian cattle were injected with the nandrolone metabolite and bodenone, which the court called “interesting and effective.”
However, ITIA argued that even if Moore had eaten contaminated meat, she should have been aware of the risk.
The court “categorically denied” that Moore was at fault or negligent in eating the meat. It added that players were not warned about the risks and that the warning was not issued until “well after” the incident.
