Top Broadband Director Warns of Musk Handout in Scathing Email Exit
On Sunday morning, the director of the largest federal broadband program in U.S. history bid farewell to his colleagues in a vibrant email. Among other things, Evan Feinman warns that if the rules are changed to favor Elon Musk’s satellite Internet company Starlink.
Until March 16, Feinman was Broadband benefits, access and deployment plansa $42.5 billion fund as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Employment Act of 2021. In the Blues PostFeinman issued an alarm on the proposed beads.
“The new administration appears to want to make changes to ignore the clear direction set by Congress, reduce the number of U.S. homes and businesses that get fiber connections, and increase the number of satellite connections,” Feinman wrote.
By satellite, he means Starlink. Amazon’s project is also technically eligible for bead funding, but currently only have two prototype satellites in the sky, while Starlink has over 7,000. (Site-stationary satellite internet providers such as Hughesnet and Viasat are not eligible for bead funding because they do not meet their delay requirements.)
The funds of Bead are allocated to each state by the State Telecommunications and Information Administration, which belongs to the Ministry of Commerce. Under the Biden administration, NTIA apparently favors the deployment of fiber to rural areas, which is widely regarded as the gold standard Internet connection type.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick plans to adopt a more “technologically neutral” approach to beads Report published by the Wall Street Journal. That would benefit Starlink from $10 billion to $20 billion in payments, up from $4.1 billion expected to receive under the old rules.
“Some of the horrible situations I’ve been hearing from NTIA and people close to the Department of Commerce will give Elon Musk 50% or more of the money,” Gigi Sohn, executive director of the American Public Broadband Association, told CNET.
“Lutnick obviously believes that like Trump and Musk, paying for fiber rather than satellites is a waste of money,” Blair Levin, a former FCC chief of staff and telecommunications industry analyst at New Street Research, told CNET.
fiber yes Expensive in many areas. A spokesperson for the auditor-general of Texas told me In the last interview Some rural families in West Texas need to be connected to fibers per person.
How much bead money Starlink will be able to earn can depend on where NTIA sets that threshold. Sources told me, The speed of bead behavior – A bill introduced in the House in early March – initially included a $25,000 cost threshold per position, but was later removed. If a region exceeds that number, the state’s broadband office will be able to turn Star-striped links such as “alternative technology”.
“That’s what (Feman) cares about,” Thorne said. He was worried that NTIA might set a price per time, greatly supporting satellites. “If we want to come back in five years and say, ‘Oh my goodness, we still have a huge rural digital divide in this country, that’s what we are going to do.”
Feinman’s email believes that this shift from fiber to satellite will be “a damage to rural and small-town America.” This boils down to two issues with Starlink services: speed and price. It has not proven that it can meet the speed requirements of beads, and in most regions it is also much more expensive than most regions. Internet provider.
Neither Starlink nor the Ministry of Commerce spokesperson immediately responded to CNET’s request for comment.
Can Starlink keep up with the future?
Critics believe that Starlink’s speed does not meet the bead’s speed requirements: 100Mbps download speed, 20Mbps upload and 100ms delay. The only requirement Starlink is currently facing is delays and is still much worse than the US median.
“It’s a once-in-a-lifetime investment that can be offered to expensive, slow services that aren’t scalable, it’s not the future, it’s just throwing money in the toilet,” Sohn said.
Ookla data shows that Starlink’s speed has actually dropped as more people join the network.(Disclosure: Ookla is owned by the same parent company as CNET.)
Since its debut in 2019, Starlink has launched thousands of satellites, but has also added millions of customers. Even when Starlink puts more satellites into the sky, its speed has dropped, and customers in many cities in the United States are currently unable to use it.
“I’m not sure if Lutnik is aware of this,” Levine said. “Starlink has a waiting list. They have a waiting list because they’re running out of capacity.”
Starlink said its new satellite will openly solve the capability issues, but it has not proven that it can do that — especially if millions of other homes are connected by beads.
“As a future technology, it doesn’t cut mustard,” Thorne said.
I hear a lot of rules of thumb in the Internet world called Nelson’s LawThis points out that the connection speed of high-end Internet users is growing by about 50% each year, doubling every 21 months. This has been the case every year since 1983, and that’s exactly what Feinman is worried about. Starlink may be good enough today – it has not proven to be proven by the FCC definition – but it may not handle future applications.
What’s next?
There is a lot of change now for beads. Lutnick is expected to announce rules for overhauling the program every day, which helps explain some of the urgency in Feinman’s emails.
Feinman wrote to colleagues.
If you want to have changes to the bead program with the elected representative, you can App Store or Google Play Shop. The application studies and scripts for various issues, determines relevant decision makers, and collects phone numbers for their offices.
