Sunday, March 16, 2025
HomeWorld NewsWes Streeting admits 'risk of disruption' in NHS overhaul | Global News...

Wes Streeting admits ‘risk of disruption’ in NHS overhaul | Global News Avenue

Wes Streeting admits ‘risk of disruption’ in NHS overhaul

Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the NHS has a “risk of disruption” when it tries to reform services and reduce waste, but has promised long-term improvements.

On Thursday, the street announced that the NHS England, a public administration, will be cancelled to save money and provide ministers with more control over health services.

The Labor government expects the move to take two years and save hundreds of millions of pounds that can be spent on NHS services.

On the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg’s plan, the streets defended reforms but acknowledged challenges.

When asked about the impact on patient care, he said: “Of course, there are always upfront costs. Yes, there is always a risk of disruption.”

Streeting said the former health secretary was “not ready to deal with these challenges” and believed that the England NHS” was to protect politicians like me from liability.

“I’ve seen waste, inefficiency and repetition. So of course, we should go after that.”

When asked for a second time whether it would undermine patient care due to the government’s reorganization of the NHS, street promises would provide improvements and said the waitlist for treatment has dropped.

The government said the main reason for the abolition of the UK NHS was to “cut bureaucracy” and reform the way health services operated.

It is called NHS England’s “the largest Quango in the world” – the term is used to describe publicly funded organizations of government

Currently, NHS England oversees health services, works with the government, agrees to funding and priorities, and monitors the performance of local NHS services.

Under the change, the organization will be brought to the Street-led Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC).

These reforms will not affect anyone’s access to the NHS, while health services remain free when used.

The government said the workload of the NHS and DHSC in England is expected to be about half – with about 9,000 administrative positions.

NHS England President Richard Meddings said he disagrees with the abolition of the group In his first interview Announced due to changes.

But he said in a speech to the BBC that the Bucks will now stop with the ministers, saying: “There are no longer separate vehicles that can point to (in) say that this is wrong.”

Writing in a telegramthe street suggests that the NHS England scrap was “starting, not purpose” and said he will continue to “cut down the swollen bureaucracy”.

The Health Minister’s mission is Penny Dash, who was appointed chairman of NHS England earlier this month, scrutinizing bureaucracy.

Some organizations overseen by the Department of Health include the Quality of Care, the UK Health Safety Agency and the National Institute of Health and Nursing.

Below these are patchwork for smaller public institutions at the regional and local levels.

In a speech with the BBC, the streets would not be considered by him as to what bureaucracy organisations to conduct, but it is recommended that street organizations “overregulate” the NHS services.

He said the NHS frontline leaders told him: “They often get a series of orders – sometimes contradictory and competitive demands from the Ministry of Health, NHS England and a wide range of regulators in the field.”

He said simplification would make the NHS successful, and he is “pursuing bureaucracy, not people working in it.”

He added: “Of course, I can’t paint a fact for the fact that there will be a lot of unemployment and we’re going to make sure we treat people fairly and support them correctly through the process.”

The Conservative Party welcomes the move to bring health services management back to ministerial control, but warns Labour that “if things go wrong, they won’t hide”.

The Liberal Democrats said the government should ensure that the scrapped England NHS England did not have a “negative impact on the quality of care for patients” and urged ministers to complete a review of social care.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments