Judge warns over man who ‘fathered 180 children’ | Global News Avenue

The judge used a sperm donor who claimed to have more than 180 children’s fathers to warn of the dangers of unregulated sperm donations.

Robert Charles Albon, who claims to be a Joe donor, claims that children from China to Australia have children after advertising online.

But he turned him as a donor into a “horror story” because he brought them to court after he wanted the rights of his parents to the children.

The BBC has responded with Mr Arsen.

In family court cases, it is extremely rare to openly identify children’s parents, but the family court judge said it was in the public interest to name Mr. Albon.

Jonathan Furness KC said in his judgment that he wanted to protect women from the possible consequences of unregulated sperm donation and the use of Mr. Arsen.

In this case, the baby was injected into a syringe to a homosexual couple, despite Mr. Arsen claiming that he had had secret sexual acts with his biological mother in the back of the car. This is the judge’s claim.

Cardiff Family Court heard that Mr. Alson, now in his 50s, was a “stranger” to his children, and only a few weeks old “one-time” photos encountered them in 10 minutes.

Mr. Albon applied to the court for the responsibility of the parents and named it in the birth certificate and changed the child’s name.

Mr. Alson wanted the child’s non-biological mother to be called “auntie” rather than mother, although she had been a parent since birth.

Both mothers say the pressure in legal proceedings, which took more than two years, was considered a factor in the disruption of the relationship.

The court heard the biological mother suffered from anxiety, depression and suicidal thoughts that caused the case to be even worse.

The verdict was made in 2023, but just published – Mr. Arsen claimed that when he was actually “fully self-centered” he wanted to “protect the welfare of his children.”

The judge concluded: “They chose a sperm donor and he promoted that he would keep it to his mother to see if there should be any connection.

“There is evidence in his own social media material that Al doesn’t say it’s a position.”

The court found that Mr. Alson was originally from the United States but had been living in northeast England. This is what he denied.

“In fact, he is a man trying to control,” the judge said.

“Women and children seem to be almost his commodity as he set out to increase the number of children around the world – China, the United States, Argentina, Australia and the United Kingdom, listing only some of the countries where he had children.”

In this case, the judge found that “there is no positive welfare benefit to change the child’s name” and that the direct connection between him and the child will not be in the best interest of the child.

No mother objected to the “mailbox contact”, so Mr. Albon could send an annual card or email to keep the child’s age and know who he was from.

Mr. Albon advertises on social media accounts like Facebook and Instagram and donates through various methods, including artificial insemination and more natural methods such as sex.

“I had about 180 live births, and I encountered about 60,” he said in an interview with Sun last August.

“I may never see much, it has something to do with the mother relationship of the child…I prefer to have some kind of relationship.”

The nonbiological mother said Mr. Arsen insisted that having parental rights was a “nightmare and horror story.”

“She believes the world needs to understand the risks associated with unregulated sperm donation,” the judge said.

“The public and vulnerable women who seek pregnancy should know this, and they risk similar to ‘horror stories’.”

The judge said he hopes that “the potential consequences of unregulated sperm donations, often from Joe donor himself.”

He added: “He is a man who intends to continue donating sperm and vulnerable women interested in such services and should be fully aware of the risks of participating with him.”

His way of giving sperm is not regulated because it is not through licensed clinics, does not limit the number of children, mandatory health checks or is protected from the legal rights of parents.

British regulations say Sperm from a single donor used by a licensed clinic Can be used to create up to 10 families.

Mr. Alson had previously talked about the motivation for donation. He claims he wants to help create a life, and it is an insult when people say he is just doing it for sex. He said he didn’t make money from it and was usually lucky to make money.

Family Court litigation is private, although journalists can participate and report certain information under recent changes to court rules in England and Wales.

Measures have been taken to ensure that the child cannot be identified.

In this case, it is unusual that the guardian acting on behalf of the child made this application Judgment should be published online The father should be named.

It is believed that it is important that the public should be aware of the dangers of informal sperm donation. Both mothers agreed to publish.

The Human Fertilization and Embryoology Administration (HFEA) says it is always safer to treat donor sperm in licensed clinics, “where there are laws and guidance to protect and support patients and donors.”

Clare Ettinghausen of HFEA said licensed clinics are also expected to comply with the “10 Family Limits”, limiting the number of families that can be created with a single donor.

If you are affected by any questions raised in this story, you can go through BBC action line.