Matt Dawson: England’s Six Nations gameplan leaves them vulnerable
Ireland accelerated from England and scored 22 points in the second half of the second half.
This is not the first time England has gradually disappeared in the second half of the year. This is the characteristics of their fall in autumn, Australia and South Africa. I think there are two aspects.
First of all, their game plan is very harsh. Maybe it is too required.
In defense, they proposed a large line speed, another stage. Then, in the offensive, they focused on moving balls, involving forward and back. Burning through energy, it feels crazy and crazy. Of course, ambitious. In the end, I think they paid the price at the back end of the game.
Someone needs to calm down, and occasionally leaves the pace of the game. At present, they are incorporated into this comprehensive action plan A. It is difficult to maintain during the 80 -minute process, without a bench that can copy what the starting team does.
In the second half of the year, Iland had a pause when leading, but the game was still balanced. During this period, England’s players stood in that player, and the two talked instead of squeezing and working hard to work in Ireland.
Each team must face those moments, while the captain reaches the eighth and semi -guards so that everyone will unite to formulate strategies and enter the same page.
As I mentioned, the second part of England’s tendency to withdraw from Peter’s withdrawal of the game should be part of the solution-alternative.
I thought Fin Smith joined England when he came to England in the last 15 minutes. There are some things about him. He is very composed and always chooses a good choice to make the team move forward.
