Welfare reform is next, but Labour ministers are treading carefully | Global News Avenue

When Sir Keir Starmer was preparing to run for the Labor leadership in 2020, his campaign director told the future Prime Minister to be vital to the party.

Morgan McSweeney emphasized that regardless of their faction, the Labor Party members have certain core principles-the primary task on the list is to crack down on poverty and defend the welfare country.

This is why any worker politicians must be cautious when studying welfare reform.

However, this government is not only considering reform benefits-it is preparing to place it at the core of its economic agenda.

In a large number of growth speeches on Rachel Reeves this week, she vowed to realize the “basic” reform of the welfare system. rise”.

What does that mean?

Now, the problem is to solve the madness between the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Pension (DWP).

Liz Kendall work and retirement secretary will be proposed “Green leather paper” -The policy recommendations-For more than a month of welfare reform, it aims to prove how serious the government is looking for ways to make more people enter work-and save funds from the welfare budget.

This dual motivation explains why it regards it as an urgent question at the top of the government.

The ministers were worried about the surge in the number of welfares. At the same time, the Ministry of Finance needs to ensure that it is not there Broken your own financial rulesEssence

A source of the Ministry of Finance said: “Because of the impact of cost, this is a high age agenda for us, but it is also a wider economic problem. It is an economic problem that is not active.”

On 10th Tangning Street, the assistant said that solving this problem will be a truly serious sign of Sir Kyle’s reform of public services.

Last year, the government It spent 6.5 billion pounds for disease benefits -In a year than the popularity of the big popularity, an increase of 25 %. It is predicted that before the next election, this number will increase to about 100 billion pounds.

Some of them are COVID’s inheritance. However, the Prime Minister clearly stated that another reason for this surge was “reverse incentives” in the system.

The minister and officials complained again and again, asking people who are generally credit to show evidence of their application or facing sanctions-but the unemployed people are also qualified to obtain disease welfare and need to find jobs.

The ministers believe that this encourages some people to “game systems”. Some workers are worried that the video on Tiktok and other platforms will exacerbate this problem, especially among young people, explaining the best way to fill in the questionnaire to the claimer in order to obtain the benefits of the disease.

Officials are studying a choice, as in the past-whether there should be some disease benefits to seek jobs-but there is no risk, they will lose the benefits of the disease.

A senior government sources said: “Many people tell us that they are afraid of work, just in case, and then they cannot return to the security net.”

Some people in the government said that this may require a more frequent evaluation of the health of the claimer, but those participating in the discussion acknowledge that the situation to explain to DWP may usually be “traumatic”, “humiliation” and “horror” And “horror”.

Better training and coaches can provide help, but the funds involved may get along well with the Ministry of Finance of the Savings model.

This is complicated-that is before you even enter finance and politics.

Financially, this round of welfare reform aims to generate savings that can be “rated”.

However, those who participated in the past budget warned that persuading OBR would actually have “basically impossible” savings.

Then is politics.

As the Chief of Staff of Sir Keir found, the Labor Party is deeply dedicated to the welfare country and is very anxious about anything that looks like a safe network.

This is not only a member of the party, but also the members of Congress. In a large amount of intake of members of the Labor Congress in 2024, one of the most common reasons for their participation in the Labor Party is to oppose conservative tightening and welfare reduction.

This means that even those who are most loyal to Starmer and Reeves have expressed major anxiety about the travel direction.

Some of these tensions have begun to pour into the public.

exist PMQ this week Debbie AbrahamsThe chief of the labor chairman of the work and pension chooses the committee that the “guess” found from the social security budget can save about billions of pounds, which makes “many fragile claimers (feel) worry.”

She warned the Prime Minister that “language is important.”

Senior workers involved in the discussion insisted that Raves and Stemer were consistent with public opinion, not members of the Labor Parliament.

A person complained: “If you ask the Labor Congress, whether they are willing to stand on the side of the public, or on one side of many labor movements and vocal disorders-well, for some of them, this is a marginal phone call “” “

Others warned the public’s view of this issue: “The public thinks they support the reduction of benefits until they hear a story about someone’s sympathy for losses. Then they don’t.”

Some older hand warning said that how fast the government abandoned it with its basic footsteps and pointed The decision of the party’s decision to abstain from the conservative welfare bill in July 2015Essence

The scale of the anger of labor members is that conservative welfare reduction has no objection. Many people think that this is the main reason for the long shadow leadership campaign of Jeremy Corbyn.

Jon Ashworth is a former shadow cabinet minister. He is still close to top political parties. He urges the government to “help people engage in good and high -paying work”, which is the core of their reform arguments.

He said: “As the current design welfare system, people will lose their jobs and actively deny those who want to work real and truly help.”

These political considerations are not a new field of Rids. Before the 2015 election, she was a shadow work and pension secretary for two years.

Her vowing is “more difficult than the Conservative Party”, which has caused great controversy with the party’s grassroots for many years. Talk to the new politician in 2021 Rids admits that she may have put forward her views “badly”, but insisted on saying: “It is not always a sign of success in welfare. In fact, when society fails, Bill is rising. It’s “.

For Rids, these dilemma may not be fresh, but they make some of her colleagues at a time.

A minister said, “Of course, I am worried about this politics.”

“Anyone with a brain will worry about it.”